Framework
OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2026
A widely used community-driven reference for identifying and mitigating security risks in applications powered by large language models, published by the OWASP GenAI Security Project.
The OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2026 is a community-driven reference for LLM security, developed by hundreds of contributors and published by the OWASP GenAI Security Project on 3 August 2026. It is not a formal standard: it is one of the most widely referenced community guides, and it maps its risk areas to NIST, MITRE ATLAS, CWE, and the OWASP Top 10 for Agentic Applications.
This entry does not reproduce the official item list. Ranking, identifiers and wording change between editions, and ATLAS does not maintain a competing summary: the official resource is the primary source for the current ten risks and their identifiers.
What changed in 2026
- The 2026 edition was published on 3 August 2026 and incorporates updated rankings and expanded threat coverage.
- Its methodology weighs expert judgement against a large body of real-world AI security incidents.
- It expands mappings to NIST, MITRE ATLAS, CWE and the OWASP Top 10 for Agentic Applications.
ATLAS does not assert item-level equivalence with any edition. The mapping below is expressed at the level of risk area and typed by the strength of the relationship.
Mapping to the ATLAS Risk Catalogue
| OWASP risk area | ATLAS entry | Mapping type |
|---|---|---|
| Prompt Injection | Prompt Injection | exact |
| Sensitive Information Disclosure | Sensitive Data Disclosure | partial |
| Supply Chain | Agentic Supply Chain Compromise | partial |
| Data and Model Poisoning | Data and Model Poisoning | exact |
| Improper Output Handling | Improper Output Handling | exact |
| Excessive Agency | Excessive Agency | exact |
| System Prompt Leakage | System Prompt Leakage | partial |
| Vector and Embedding Weaknesses | Vector and Embedding Weaknesses | exact |
| Misinformation | Misinformation | related |
| Unbounded Consumption | Unbounded Consumption | exact |
| Overreliance | No direct ATLAS entry | related_to โ Misinformation |
| Model Theft | No direct ATLAS entry | related_to โ Sensitive Data Disclosure |
Why two mappings are not equivalences
ATLAS explicitly avoids presenting false equivalence:
- Overreliance is not Misinformation. Overreliance is the acceptance of model output without verification; Misinformation is false or misleading content presented with apparent authority. They are related, not identical.
- Model Theft is not Sensitive Data Disclosure. Model theft affects the confidentiality of weights, architecture or IP. Sensitive Data Disclosure concerns information exposed through prompts, outputs, logs, retrieval or connected tools.
ATLAS connection
The OWASP LLM Top 10 describes the LLM application threat surface. ATLAS connects each mapped risk area to controls and evidence. Relevant controls include Input and Output Validation for AI Agent Components, Prompt and Output Logging, and Data Classification Before AI Use.
Official source: OWASP